Degree of cure of orthodontic composite attachments underneath aligners

Author:

Lasance Sandrine Janine1ORCID,Koletsi Despina12ORCID,Eliades George3ORCID,Eliades Theodore1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry Center of Dental Medicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

2. Meta‐Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) Stanford University California USA

3. Department of Biomaterials School of Dentistry National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess the percentage degree of cure (DC%) of 2‐mm‐thick resin composite attachments used for aligner treatment. Three types of aligner – two thermoformed aligners (Clear Aligner [CLA], polyethylene terephthalate glycol modified; and Invisalign [INV], polyester urethane) and a three‐dimensional‐printed aligner (Graphy TC‐85DAC [GRP], an acrylate‐methacrylate copolymer) – were selected, along with two universal resin composites (3M Filtek Universal [FTU] and Charisma Topaz ONE [CTO]). Samples of each composite were placed under each aligner, and the degree of cure of each composite was evaluated on the top (facing the aligner) and the bottom (facing the substrate) attachment surfaces after curing. Five specimens were used per combination of aligner and composite, and an additional group of composites irradiated without aligners served as the control. The DC% measurements were performed using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR‐FTIR) spectroscopy. The DC% across the aligners were (median values) 33.8%–44.8% for CLA, 33.6%–40.8% for INV, 32.8%–40.6% for GRP, and 40.0%–51.7% for the control group. The DC% values of the attachments cured under any aligner were significantly lower than that of the corresponding control, with the values recorded on the top surfaces being 6% higher than those on the bottom surfaces after adjusting for aligner group and composite type.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference35 articles.

1. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances;Rosvall MD;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009

2. Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses

3. Surface wear of resin composites used for Invisalign attachments;Barreda GJ;Acta Odontol Latinoam,2017

4. The use of attachments in aligner treatment: Analyzing the “innovation” of expanding the use of acid etching–mediated bonding of composites to enamel and its consequences

5. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds;Asmussen E;Scand J Dent Res,1982

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3