Affiliation:
1. School of Applied Psychology Griffith University Mt Gravatt Queensland Australia
2. Menzies Health Institute Queensland Gold Coast Queensland Australia
3. Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland
4. School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada
5. Faculty of Health Southern Cross University Coolangatta Queensland Australia
6. Health Sciences Research Institute University of California—Merced Merced California USA
Abstract
AbstractRegular physical activity is an important health promoting behavior. Yet, many adults live sedentary lifestyles, especially during their workday. The current study applies an extended theory of planned behavior model, incorporating affective attitudes and instrumental attitudes, along with habit, to predict limiting sedentary behavior and physical activity within an office environment. Theory of planned behavior constructs and habit were assessed with an online survey on a sample of 180 full‐time office workers, with self‐reported behavior assessed 1 week later (Mage = 25.97, SDage = 10.24; 44 males, 134 females, and 2 nonbinary). Model fit was indicated by BRMSEA (M = 0.057, SD = 0.023), B γ^ (M = 0.984, SD = 0.010) and BCFI (M = 0.959, SD = 0.026), accounting for 46.1% of variance in intention, 21.6% of variance in sedentary behavior, and 17.4% of variance in physical activity behavior. A Bayesian structural equation model revealed direct effects of instrumental attitudes and perceived behavioral control on intention to limit sedentary behavior, direct effects of intention and perceived behavioral control on limiting sedentary behavior, and direct effects of perceived behavioral control and habit on engaging in physical activity. The current study indicates intentions to be active in the office are primarily driven by beliefs about the benefits of activity and individuals' perceived level of control, rather than normative or affective beliefs. As behavior was predicted by both intention and habit, findings also indicate office‐based activity is likely not always a consciously driven decision. These findings may have implications for improving activity levels in this highly sedentary population.
Reference106 articles.
1. Methods of Measurement in epidemiology: Sedentary Behaviour
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018).National Health Survey: First results 2017–18.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献