Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, Politics and Economics Witten/Herdecke University Witten Germany
2. Department of Sociology Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA
3. Department of Political Science University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
Abstract
AbstractWhile causal inference has become front and center in empirical political science, we know little about how to analyze causality with latent outcomes, such as political values, beliefs, and attitudes. In this article, we develop a framework for defining, identifying, and estimating the causal effect of an observed treatment on a latent outcome, which we call the latent treatment effect (LTE). We describe a set of assumptions that allow us to identify the LTE and propose a hierarchical item response model to estimate it. We highlight an often overlooked exclusion restriction assumption, which states that treatment status should not affect the observed indicators other than through the latent outcome. A simulation study shows that the hierarchical approach offers unbiased estimates of the LTE under the identification and modeling assumptions, whereas conventional two‐step approaches are biased. We illustrate our proposed methodology using data from two published experimental studies.
Reference33 articles.
1. Effects of Differential Measurement Error in Self‐Reported Diet in Longitudinal Lifestyle Intervention Studies;Aaby David;International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity,2021
2. Estimating Endogenous Treatment Effects Using Latent Factor Models with and without Instrumental Variables;Banerjee Souvik;Econometrics,2021
3. Treatment effect estimation with covariate measurement error
4. Structural Equations with Latent Variables
5. Latent Variables in Psychology and the Social Sciences
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献