Curriculum renewal towards critically conscious graduates: Implications for faculty development

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionGlobally, faculty development initiatives in support of health professions (HP) educators continue to extend their remit. This work becomes more critical as HP curriculum renewal activities are influenced by needing to move beyond a biomedical focus attending to issues such as social accountability, social justice and health equity. This raises questions about how best to support our HP educators who may need to change their teaching practice as they embrace these more complex, social constructs.MethodsThe research question for this qualitative study was: What implications are there for faculty development that can support HP educators as they are expected to incorporate the principles of critical consciousness and social accountability into their teaching as part of a curriculum renewal process? Data from 11 focus group discussions and 11 subsequent individual interviews with HP educators from two undergraduate programmes were thematically analysed after which further analysis focussed on the implications of these findings for faculty development. Transformative learning theory and models about change provided a sensitising framework.ResultsOur findings pointed to an expanded role for HP educators and consequently also for those responsible for faculty development. Three main ideas were highlighted: Curriculum renewal catalyses a renewed need for faculty development, the nature of faculty development that can enable change and new foci for faculty development.ConclusionsFaculty development can make a significant contribution to enabling change, including in the context of curriculum renewal that often extends the roles and responsibilities of HP educators. When renewal seeks to shift fundamental curriculum principles, providing support to embrace this expanded remit results in an equally expanded remit for faculty developers—one that calls for initiatives that enable critical, dialogic encounters that might foster critical consciousness, leading to change in HP education. This challenges us, as faculty developers, to turn the mirror on ourselves to consider the nature of such expanded support.