Beyond Single‐Mindedness: A Figure‐Ground Reversal for the Cognitive Sciences

Author:

Dingemanse Mark1,Liesenfeld Andreas1,Rasenberg Marlou12,Albert Saul3,Ameka Felix K.4,Birhane Abeba56,Bolis Dimitris78,Cassell Justine910,Clift Rebecca11,Cuffari Elena12,De Jaegher Hanne13,Novaes Catarina Dutilh1415,Enfield N. J.16,Fusaroli Riccardo171819,Gregoromichelaki Eleni20,Hutchins Edwin21,Konvalinka Ivana22,Milton Damian23,Rączaszek‐Leonardi Joanna24,Reddy Vasudevi25,Rossano Federico21,Schlangen David26,Seibt Johanna27,Stokoe Elizabeth328,Suchman Lucy29,Vesper Cordula1718,Wheatley Thalia3031,Wiltschko Martina32

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University

2. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics

3. Discourse and Rhetoric Group, Loughborough University

4. Centre for Linguistics, Leiden University

5. Mozilla Foundation

6. School of Computer Science, University College Dublin

7. Independent Max Planck Research Group for Social Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry

8. National Institute for Physiological Sciences

9. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University

10. Paris Artificial Intelligence Research Institute

11. Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex

12. Department of Psychology, Franklin and Marshall College

13. IAS‐Research Center for Mind, Life and Society, Department of Philosophy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)

14. Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

15. Arché, University of St. Andrews

16. Department of Linguistics, The University of Sydney

17. Department of Linguistics, Cognitive Science & Semiotics, Aarhus University

18. Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University

19. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania

20. Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg

21. Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego

22. Section for Cognitive Systems, DTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark

23. Tizard Centre, University of Kent

24. Human Interactivity and Language Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw

25. Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth

26. Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam

27. Research Unit for Robophilosophy and Integrative Social Robotics, School of Culture and Society, Aarhus University

28. Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics

29. Department of Sociology, Lancaster University

30. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College

31. Santa Fe Institute

32. Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

Abstract

AbstractA fundamental fact about human minds is that they are never truly alone: all minds are steeped in situated interaction. That social interaction matters is recognized by any experimentalist who seeks to exclude its influence by studying individuals in isolation. On this view, interaction complicates cognition. Here, we explore the more radical stance that interaction co‐constitutes cognition: that we benefit from looking beyond single minds toward cognition as a process involving interacting minds. All around the cognitive sciences, there are approaches that put interaction center stage. Their diverse and pluralistic origins may obscure the fact that collectively, they harbor insights and methods that can respecify foundational assumptions and fuel novel interdisciplinary work. What might the cognitive sciences gain from stronger interactional foundations? This represents, we believe, one of the key questions for the future. Writing as a transdisciplinary collective assembled from across the classic cognitive science hexagon and beyond, we highlight the opportunity for a figure‐ground reversal that puts interaction at the heart of cognition. The interactive stance is a way of seeing that deserves to be a key part of the conceptual toolkit of cognitive scientists.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference53 articles.

1. Repair: The Interface Between Interaction and Cognition

2. What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice

3. Arkel J. V. Woensdregt M. Dingemanse M. &Blokpoel M.(2020).A simple repair mechanism can alleviate computational demands of pragmatic reasoning: Simulations and complexity analysis. InProceedings of the 24th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning.Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/2020.conll‐1.14

4. Every product needs a process: unpacking joint commitment as a process across species

5. Reasons for requests

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3