Comparison of rockburst occurrence during extraction of thick coal seams using top-coal caving versus slicing mining methods

Author:

Li Zhen-lei12,He Xue-qiu13,Dou Lin-ming2,Song Da-zhao13

Affiliation:

1. School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.

3. Zhong-an Academy of Safety Engineering, Beijing 100083, China.

Abstract

In recent years, rockbursts have occurred frequently during the mining of thick coal seams in China. Use of the top-coal caving or slicing mining method to extract these thick seams may result in distinct geomechanical responses in the strata and, in turn, the pattern of rockburst occurrence around longwall layouts. To establish a thorough understanding of which method (caving or slicing) is better when it comes to preventing rockbursts during the extraction process, a suite of in situ rockburst measurements was conducted. Six typical rockburst-prone collieries were monitored during which a total of 110 rockburst events occurred. Numerical modelling was used to help interpret the observations. Here, we focus on the analysis of these field observations and the numerical simulations employed to develop a conceptual model for rockburst occurrence during caving mining of thick coal seams. We find that caving mining has a certain rockburst-reducing effect in that the method significantly decreases, or even avoids, the occurrence of rockbursts at coalfaces. Moreover, it reduces the scope of the damage likely to be incurred and the severity and frequency of rockbursting. According to the conceptual model, the rockburst-prone area during caving mining is generally the roadway section located a certain distance ahead of the coalface. This distance, which is roughly 10–54 m, is consistent with the rockburst damage observed on site (mostly 10–50 m ahead of the coalface). This rockburst pattern arises because caving mining results in reduced stress concentration, less bottom coal being retained, and wider-ranging fracture zones around the mine openings, especially ahead of the coalface. This makes the rock surrounding the mine openings less likely to accumulate high levels of elastic energy that need releasing and hence it is more difficult to induce rockbursting. Therefore, it is recommended that the top-coal caving method should be the preferred method of extraction when mining coal seams of a certain thickness.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Civil and Structural Engineering,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference55 articles.

1. Brauner, G. 1985. Ground pressure and rockburst. Translated by L. Yu-sheng. China Coal Industry Publishing House, Beijing.

2. Cai, M.F., He, M.C., and Liu, D.Y. 2013. Rock mechanics and engineering, 2nd ed. Science Press, Beijing.

3. A principal component analysis/fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for coal burst liability assessment

4. Chen, G.X. 2009. Mechanism research of the maximum horizontal stress on rockburst and its application. Ph.D. thesis, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, pp. 116.

5. Dou, L.M., and He, X.Q. 2001. Theory and technology of rock burst prevention. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3