Growth of loblolly pine rooted cuttings compared with seedlings

Author:

Foster G. S.,Lambeth C. C.,Greenwood M. S.

Abstract

Growth and morphology of loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.) rooted cuttings were compared with that for seedlings after several years in the field in two experiments. Experiment 1 included rooted cuttings from 1- and 5-year-old ortets and seedlings from the same five families and experiment 2 compared rooted cuttings from 4-year-old ortets with seedlings from the same 15 families. Significant age-related effects on the growth of the rooted cuttings, even with as little as 4 years difference in ortet age, were observed. Height, DBH, and number of growth cycles, but not number of branches per unit of height or per growth cycle, differed significantly between the two cutting sources. Size and condition of the rooted cuttings and seedlings at the time of planting influenced their growth for several years afterward and could be a confounding factor in comparisons among propagule types. In experiment 1 cuttings outgrew seedlings, while in experiment 2 the reverse occurred. Considering both experiments, growth in the early years seems to be related more to condition of the propagule rather than asexual or sexual origin when unconfounded with age. The family rank correlations between propagation types for the same trait were always positive but were significant for only part of the traits, while the correlations among traits for the same propagation type were generally, but not always, lower for rooted cuttings than seedlings. This effect was pronounced in the first few years after field planting and was likely the result of plant quality (variability induced by the rooting and conditioning system) rather than propagation type; nonetheless, there is cause for concern when using early field data from rooted cutting trials to rank family performance.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Ecology,Forestry,Global and Planetary Change

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3