Repeated-load response of aggregates in relation to track quality index

Abstract

Track quality rating systems are briefly introduced as a background for undertaking a study of the repeated-load response of ballast aggregates. The results from a number of different laboratory investigations are reviewed and this data interpreted in terms of track quality behaviour. The paper reviews selected results from repeated-load triaxial tests used to investigate the repeated-loading response of different granular railway ballasts at stress levels comparable with those below North America heavy freight axle loads. These results are used to establish an aggregate index to predict deformation and breakdown of ballast under repeated loading. Large-scale test programs are reviewed that relate aggregate quality to simulated ballasted track formation response using a 0.9 m long by 250 mm wide tie to represent a typical loaded rail seat. The large-scale testing was restricted to one aggregate that was subjected to a range of load levels and artificial subgrade stiffness. Similar related work on coarse, single-sized aggregates recommended for drainage layers in highway pavements is reviewed to illustrate the trade-offs between support compressibility and quality of aggregate defined by the aggregate index value. The laboratory tests and model performance are compared with published data to establish a laboratory performance rating in the form of an aggregate index for prediction of those track quality indices that relate to deformation as a function of aggregate type. Key words : ballast, aggregate, hardness, toughness, railway, track quality.