Determination of low bacterial concentrations in hyperarid Atacama soils: comparison of biochemical and microscopy methods with real-time quantitative PCR

Author:

Fletcher Lauren E.12,Conley Catharine A.3,Valdivia-Silva Julio E.2,Perez-Montaño Saul24,Condori-Apaza Renee5,Kovacs Gregory T.A.6,Glavin Daniel P.7,McKay Christopher P.2

Affiliation:

1. Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Planetary Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, Park Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK.

2. Space Sciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.

3. Planetary Sciences Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546-0001, USA.

4. San Jose State University, Department of Chemistry, San Jose, CA 95192-0101, USA.

5. Universidad Nacional de San Agustín, Arequipa, Perú.

6. Stanford University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, CA 94305-9505, USA.

7. Solar System Exploration Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Code 699 Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA.

Abstract

Hyperarid Atacama soils are reported to contain significantly reduced numbers of microbes per gram of soil relative to soils from other environments. Molecular methods have been used to evaluate microbial populations in hyperarid Atacama soils; however, conflicting results across the various studies, possibly caused by this low number of microorganisms and consequent biomass, suggest that knowledge of expected DNA concentrations in these soils becomes important to interpreting data from any method regarding microbial concentrations and diversity. In this paper we compare the number of bacteria per gram of Atacama Desert soils determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction with the number of bacteria estimated by the standard methods of phospholipids fatty acid analysis, adenine composition (determined by liquid chromatography – time-of-flight mass spectrometry), and SYBR-green microscopy. The number determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction as implemented in this study was several orders of magnitude lower than that determined by the other three methods and probably underestimates the concentrations of soil bacteria, most likely because of soil binding during the DNA extraction methods. However, the other methods very possibly overestimate the bacteria concentrations owing to desiccated, intact organisms, which would stain positive in microscopy and preserve both adenine and phospholipid fatty acid for the other methods.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Genetics,Molecular Biology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,General Medicine,Immunology,Microbiology

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3