Comparison of commercial viral genomic extraction kits for the molecular detection of foodborne viruses

Abstract

When genetic material is extracted from viruses responsible for food illnesses, two broad types of possibilities are offered: conventional methods, which are well established but usually long and exacting to perform, or commercial kits, which are faster and easy to use but much more expensive. Thus, it is important to evaluate some performance parameters such as the analytical sensitivity to be able to select the optimal technique for each situation. The principal objective of this study was to establish and compare the analytical sensitivities of three commercial genetic material extraction methods (TRIzol reagent, FTA cards, and QIAGEN kits) along with three selected viruses, adenovirus, hepatitis A virus, and rotavirus. Viral detection was carried out using a standard PCR technique for adenovirus and reverse transcription PCR for rotavirus and hepatitis A virus. The results obtained showed that with the QIAGEN kit, the sensitivity was 2 logs lower than with the two other methods for all three viruses studied. Nevertheless, despite their lower analytical sensitivities, the other two extraction methods should not be overlooked and ought to be considered when evaluating the most efficient approach suitable for a specific commodity, since food-related outbreaks may be traced to a wide variety of food types.