Paradigm shifts in forestry and forest research: a bibliometric analysis

Author:

Polinko Adam D.12,Coupland Kathleen2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University, Box 9681, MS 39762, USA.

2. Forest Resources Management Department, Forest Sciences Centre, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Abstract

Forestry literature often suggests that the scope of forestry and forest research has changed, though there is limited empirical evidence to support this hypothesis. We used a bibliometric approach to quantify changes in word frequency in titles of documents in the Web of Science category “forestry”. Single words and word pairs (bigrams) were extracted from a total of 150 679 documents across 651 sources that spanned the period of 1956–2019. We identified increasing and decreasing trends in word frequency, identified influential documents, and examined country of origin. The number of documents published in forestry research has increased annually, with the United States, Canada, and China producing the highest quantities. The most influential documents in the data set involved methodology, stand development, and climate change. Word frequencies revealed a shift in research away from sustained-yield-based forestry and towards a more interdisciplinary view of forests as ecologically important, dynamic systems. We argue that changes in research trends reflect a broader paradigm shift towards sustainable forest management.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Ecology,Forestry,Global and Planetary Change

Reference60 articles.

1. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests

2. Allen, T., and Krogman, N. 2013. Unheard voices: Aboriginal content in professional forestry curriculum. In Aboriginal peoples and forest lands in Canada. Edited by D.B. Tindall, R.L. Trosper, and P. Perreault. UBC Press, Vancouver, B.C. p. 279.

3. bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis

4. Public Perceptions of Clearcutting

5. Trends in research and collaboration in the Canadian Model Forest Network, 1993–2010

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3