Abstract
During a recent pilot survey in Newfoundland, forest data were collected using a stratified, one-stage cluster-sampling design. The data were analyzed to determine if, within the stratified framework, cluster sampling would be more efficient than simple random sampling. Each cluster consisted of five point-samples located in a straight line. For the analysis, volume and variance estimates were determined from clusters of 1,2,3,4 and 5 points. During the survey, records were kept of the time required to complete various field-sampling tasks. These were used in lieu of cost data in the analysis. Results indicated that, for the given conditions, simple random sampling was more efficient than cluster sampling. However, relatively small changes in the conditions would make cluster sampling more efficient.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Ecology,Forestry,Global and Planetary Change
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献