Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah, India.
Abstract
The present study predicted the pressure (Cp), drag (Cfy), and lift (Cfx) coefficients on square shape and setback building models. The study considered a conventional (1:1:2) square model, a single side single-setback, and single side double-setback models. It is very challenging to measure the different aerodynamic coefficients on the setback building models for the intermediate wind incidence angles (WIAs). At first, the study calculated the different aerodynamic coefficients by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method and then predicted the Cp of intermediate wind angles by the artificial neural network (ANN) method. The Cp for different WIAs is derived directly from the Cp versus WIAs graph. The study found the double setback model is 4.26% and 0.6% more efficient to resist the drag and lift force compared to the single setback building. Finally, the suggested setback number plays an important role to control the frequency due to pressure and velocity.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
General Environmental Science,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference50 articles.
1. ASCE/SEI: 7-10. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE), Reston, Va.
2. Comparison of aerodynamic coefficients of setback tall buildings due to wind load
3. Forecasting of Wind Induced Pressure on Setback Building Using Artificial Neural Network
4. BS: 6399-2. 1997. British standard: loading for buildings part 2. Code of practice for wind loads. British Standard Institution, London, UK.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献