Toward a generalized guideline to inform optimal site investigations for pile design

Author:

Crisp M.P.11,Jaksa M.B.11,Kuo Y.L.11

Affiliation:

1. School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, University of Adelaide, Australia.

Abstract

Insufficient or inappropriate soil testing can lead to a range of undesirable consequences, and yet there is no guideline for optimal investigation. This study analyses the influence of test type, number of boreholes, data interpretation, soil conditions, and structural configuration on site investigation performance. In addition to providing general recommendations, the relative sensitivity of these variables on performance is determined. Performance is assessed in terms of total expected project cost while implicitly incorporating the risk of damage from poor investigation. The framework for this study involves the use of randomly generated, variable, single layer virtual soils in a Monte Carlo analysis. It was found that optimal investigations can produce net savings in the order of several hundreds of thousands of Australian dollars, and key features of a future site investigation guideline are identified.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Civil and Structural Engineering,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference29 articles.

1. A New Method of Interpolation and Smooth Curve Fitting Based on Local Procedures

2. Albatal, A. 2013. Effect of inadequate site investigation on the cost and time of a construction project. Master of Science, Construction and Building Engineering Department, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Yemen.

3. Arsyad, A. 2009. The effect of limited site investigations on the design and performance of pile foundations. M.Sc. thesis, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A.

4. Bowles, J.E. 1997. Foundation analysis and design. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

5. Effective Young’s modulus of a spatially variable soil mass under a footing

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3