Recommendations for the minimum number of laboratory tests for intact rock

Author:

Fillion Marie-Hélène1,Hadjigeorgiou John2

Affiliation:

1. Bharti School of Engineering, Laurentian University, Science 2A Building, room F215B, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.

2. Pierre Lassonde Chair in Mining Engineering, Lassonde Institute of Mining, University of Toronto, Lassonde Mining Building, room 119A, 170 College St., Toronto, ON M5S 3E3, Canada.

Abstract

The design of mining excavations in rock requires access to a representative geotechnical model that includes the mechanical properties of the rock mass. The available geotechnical data provide the necessary input to analytical, numerical, and empirical design tools. Consequently, any geotechnical analysis is influenced by the quality of the input data. Therefore, to understand and mitigate the design risk caused by data uncertainty, it is critical to evaluate the level of confidence in the collected geotechnical data. A practical limitation of current mine design practice is the absence of quantitative guidelines to select the number of laboratory tests required. This investigation employs small-sampling theory to determine the minimum number of tests necessary to obtain predefined confidence intervals in intact rock estimates at South African mines. A key element of this work is the introduction of geotechnical domain complexity as a significant factor in establishing quantitative recommendations for the required minimum number of laboratory tests. A tangible contribution of this work is the development of an original methodology for planning laboratory testing campaigns for a new mining project or for updating the geotechnical database of operating mines. The proposed quantitative methods can eventually replace subjective assessments in addressing data collection requirements.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Civil and Structural Engineering,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3