Abstract
Abstract
As operators continue to focus on the importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), in conjunction with lowering monthly costs in the hydraulic fracturing space, the requests for higher horsepower density with lower emissions and fuel consumption have risen. This analysis will explore what eFrac means for fracturing optimization, reliability, and performance compared to conventional equipment. This paper will compare the digital capabilities of conventional equipment versus electrical equipment.
This investigation is based on the historical data of a field trial spanning approximately eight months, across several basins, and varying climates. In conjunction with this case study, it will correlate the performance of eFrac to that of conventional equipment, while focusing on three areas: visibility into pump performance, control of equipment to improve reliability, and energy conversion from fuel source to hydraulic horsepower for fracturing and its impact on efficiency.
Reference5 articles.
1. Daniels, J.
(2021, October3) DEP Industry Observations: Frac Market Thoughts; Casing Challenges, RNGR/BAS Closes, Rig Count Up Again. Retrieved from Daniel Energy Partners: https://www.danielep.com/news-observations
2. EIA. (2020). Annual Electric Generator Report. U.S. Energy Information Administration.
3. Efficient Electrical Energy Transmission and Distribution;IEC,2007
4. The Reciprocating Pump: Theory, Design, and use;Miller,1995
5. Othman, A. A., & Amao, A. M. (March2019). Hydraulic Fracturing Treatments in the Permian Basin: Distillation of Best Practices in Spraberry and Wolfcamp Formations." Paper presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference,. Manama, Bahrain: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献