Impact of Relative Permeability Hysteresis on the Numerical Simulation of WAG Injection

Author:

Spiteri Elizabeth J.1,Juanes Ruben1

Affiliation:

1. Stanford University

Abstract

Abstract Pore-scale physics, laboratory investigations, and field experience, dictate that three-phase relative permeabilities exhibit strong dependence on the saturation path and the saturation history. Such dependence is especially relevant in water-alternating-gas (WAG) processes, which are characterized by a sequence of three-phase drainage and imbibition cycles. In this paper, we study the influence of relative permeability hysteresis on the field-scale predictions of WAG injection. Because their measurement is difficult and timeconsuming, three-phase relative permeabilities are usually interpolated from two-phase data. The errors associated with this procedure have been investigated by Oak (SPE 20183), who reported that interpolated values may differ significantly from experimental ones. The effect of using different interpolation models in field-scale simulations has been illustrated by a number of authors, who found that recovery predictions could be significantly different depending on the three-phase relative permeability model. Here, we study the impact of using history-dependent saturation functions in reservoir simulations. First, we investigate the degree of accuracy with which different hysteretic models reproduce Oak's three-phase relative permeability data. In doing so, we assess the validity of existing models, and we identify the model parameters subject to most uncertainty. Second, we illustrate how the use of a hysteretic relative permeability model affects reservoir simulations. We use a synthetic model of a quarter five-spot pattern in a homogenous reservoir, and a more realistic heterogeneous reservoir modified from the PUNQ-S3 model. We find that there is striking disparity in the simulation results depending on whether a hysteretic or a nonhysteretic model is employed, and conclude that it is essential to incorporate hysteresis in the relative permeabilities in order to obtain accurate predictions of realistic WAG processes. Introduction Quantitative predictions of multiphase flow in porous media are necessary for the evaluation and management of oil and gas reservoirs. In particular, the simultaneous flow of three separate phases (water, oil and gas) is essential in the characterization and modeling of a number of oil recovery processes, such as waterflooding in the presence of free gas, steam injection, and CO2 flooding.1 Three-phase flow conditions become especially relevant for recovery processes based on water alternating gas (WAG) injection.2 Three-phase flows occur also in environmental applications such as geological CO2 sequestration3 and groundwater contamination by nonaqueous-phase liquids.4 These predictions are now performed routinely using numerical simulations tools. Even though reservoir models continue to increase in size and geometrical complexity, they still rely on a straightforward multiphase flow extension of Darcy's law.5 The cornerstone of multiphase flow models is the relative permeability, which accounts for the reduction in flow due to the mutual interaction of the different flowing phases. Although traditionally understood as unique functions of saturation, there is conclusive theoretical and experimental evidence that relative permeabilities depend on many other rock and fluid descriptors, including rock wettability, fluid viscosity, interfacial tension, flow rate and, of special interest to us, saturation history.6 However, because direct measurement of three-phase relative permeabilities is costly and very time consuming, it is standard practice to rely on two-phase relative permeability experimental data, and use and interpolation model to evaluate the relative permeabilities under three-phase flow conditions.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3