Affiliation:
1. BP Exploration
2. Shell Exploration & Production Co
3. University of Houston
4. Total S.A.
Abstract
Abstract
This paper proposes an approach for assessing a reservoir simulation model for use in estimating reserves. A simulation model can integrate complex static data, the physical description of displacement processes, production constraints and schedules. Hence it can provide important input to business decisions and to reserves estimation. Confidence in simulation predictions depends on the strength of evidence for the input data, quality control of the model, robustness of the history match, and whether there is independent evidence supporting predictions. We explain the principles for evaluating a simulation model and propose requirements for simulation predictions to be considered as proved reserves. This involves evaluation against different strands of evidence e.g. static and dynamic characterisation, wells and facilities description, reservoir performance and analogues. Simulation models are often built to support business decisions using best technical estimates for inputs. There can be instances where a simulation model may be reasonable and reliable but it only represents a‘best technical’ outcome. There may not be sufficient evidence to count the whole predicted recovery as proved reserves. We propose how such a model may be modified to also provide proved reserves estimates. The approach is illustrated through a case study which shows how the principles may be applied with different available data and at different stages of field life.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献