Establishing Reasonable Certainty for Reserves Estimates by Utilizing a Combination of Reliable Technologies

Author:

Narayanan Keshav1,Gale Peter1,Blangy J. P1,Young Elliott1

Affiliation:

1. Woodside Energy

Abstract

Abstract The Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS) (PRMS, 2018) and many regulatory agencies (e.g. US Securities and Exchange Commission – US SEC) require "Reasonable Certainty" for Proved Reserves estimates. The PRMS states that Reasonable Certainty can be demonstrated by use of "definitive geoscience, engineering, or performance data", while the SEC allows the application of reliable technology which they define as a "grouping of one or more technologies (including computational methods) that has been field tested to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability" (US Code of Federal Regulations § 210.4-10). The guidance provided by the PRMS or SEC for establishing reasonable certainty is general in nature due to the difficulty in explicitly describing all possible scenarios and also allows leeway to use new technologies in the future. In this context, we see the need for more discussion on how a reasonably certain case can be developed utilizing multiple technologies. Reserves estimates are snapshots in time based on the integration of the best data, analysis and forecasts available. Proper application of reliable technologies with all available data can help to refine the uncertainty ranges of reserves. We demonstrate how an overall reasonably certain estimate can be established by utilizing multiple reliable technologies even when each technology individually may not be sufficient to establish reasonable certainty. This approach can also guide how future performance data can be integrated to refine uncertainty ranges. This paper addresses the complex challenge of establishing reasonable certainty in reserves and resource assessments. The paper discusses how multiple reliable technologies may be used in concert to establish reasonable certainty for reserves estimates through the flexibility provided by the PRMS. We share our experiences with establishing reliability based on quality of data and reservoir complexity. The practical discussions in this paper will benefit subsurface teams and reserves estimators across the industry.

Publisher

SPE

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3