Affiliation:
1. Baker Hughes
2. Ain Shams University
3. British University, Egypt
Abstract
AbstractThis paper presents the integration of Geosciences data for three wells which encountered drilling challenges such as differential and mechanical sticking due to geological complexities. It demonstrates the benefits of integrating all available geoscience data in detecting the drilling hazards, delineating the troublesome zones, and offering a complete solution, including drilling best practices and drilling fluids design based on Geological, Sedimentological, Geomechanical and Petrophysical data analysis.A drilling risk assessment was conducted through an analysis of daily drilling reports for the three wells in the field, meanwhile a Post-drill Geomechanical model was constructed for the same wells using all available data.A Petrophysical analysis of the same wells was completed using wireline data to define the major parameters related to drilling risks such as porosity, permeability, facies changes, formation water salinity and shale volume.A Sedimentological analysis utilized the available information from mud logs, image logs, and core data and cuttings descriptions, to correlate drilling risks with certain lithofacies.This case study considers with the geomechanical model of three wells, including their drilling history, stress/pore pressure models, and rock properties. Additional highlights from the image logs are featured, showing anisotropic bedding plane failure, as well as a comparison of the images to the geomechanical model.This case study concludes the risk and a proposed mitigation strategies that could be implemented to limit the risks posed by high overbalance, clay mineralogy, weak bedding planes and permeable sand layers and to minimize instability when drilling vertical and laterals holes in in this area or similarly complex areas.The pressure surveys revealed the presence of both hydrocarbon and water bearing zones. The pressure gradient was 0.14 psi/ft within the hydrocarbon pay zones, whereas a 0.44 psi/ft pressure gradient confirmed the water bearing zones. The same formation pressure data was utilized to calibrate the pore pressure calculations used for the geomechanical model.All Sedimentological and Petrophysical analyses, along with the post-drill Geomechanical analysis, were utilized to define final solutions for optimum well delivery during drilling, completion, and stimulation Phases.Utilizing the analytics of integrated geoscience data such as sedimentology and petrophysics information, along with geomechanical modeling, can help in understanding the subsurface challenges and propose optimal solutions for optimum well delivery avoiding severe tight spots, differential sticking and pack off, in additions of minimizing the formation damages.
Reference13 articles.
1. Ahmed Reda , Abdel HakimHashem (2009). NEW METHOD FOR ENHANCING THE VERTICAL RESOLUTION OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE DATA CALIBRATED TO CORE ANALYSIS AND RESISTIVITY IMAGING DATA FOR IMPROVED QUANTIFICATION OF RESERVES IN THINLY BEDDED RESERVOIRS. Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition in Ravenna, Italy, March 25-27, 2009.
2. Ajay Addagalla , IainMaley, IshaqLawal, PrakashJadhav, and MoroniLuigi (2018). Minimum Stress, Maximum Pressure: A New High Performance Bridging System Facilitates Drilling Depleted Formations at High Overbalance in Middle East, SPE-192051-MS presentation at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition held in Brisbane, Australia, 23-25 October 2018.
3. Alberty, M.W. and McLean, M.R. 2014. The Use of Modeling to Enhance the Analysis of Formation Pressure Integrity Tests. Presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, 4-6 March, Fort Worth, Texas, USA. SPE-167945-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167945-MS.
4. Benaissa, S., Ong, S., and Bachelot, A. 2006. Preventing mud losses and differential sticking by altering effective stress of depleted sands. Presented at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, 13-15November, Bangkok, Thailand. SPE-103816-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/103816-MS.
5. CAKE FILTRATION: MECHANISM, PARAMETERS, AND MODELING11Parts of this chapter have been reprinted with permission of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and the Society of Petroleum Engineers from Civan (©1998b,c AIChE, and ©1999b,c SPE).