Cement Placement Modeling—A Review

Author:

Bois A.-P.1ORCID,Zhao H.2ORCID,Wen D.2ORCID,Luo Y.2ORCID,Li Y.2ORCID,Badalamenti A. M.3ORCID,Song M.2ORCID,Calvo C.4ORCID,Reñe J.4ORCID,Liang H.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CURISTEC (Corresponding author)

2. China Oilfield Services Limited

3. CURISTEC

4. CURISIT

Abstract

SummaryEnsuring cement sheath placement is of paramount importance for the success of a primary cementing operation. Poor mud displacement and fluid contamination can lead to cement isolation failure, loss of production, and even well abandonment. Over time, many cement placement computerized models have been developed, leading to a significant number of theoretical and case history papers. However, using these to design a cement job is difficult because their physical and mathematical assumptions are most of the time unclear, and because their application requires balancing precision with computation time. Models that are too precise may lead to very long runs, while oversimplified models could result in nonpredictive simulations. To the authors’ knowledge, nothing has been published to explain how to perform efficient predictions with a cement placement computerized model. Such is the object of this paper. It presents an extensive analysis of all the available cement placement computerized models, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages and listing their assumptions. This analysis indicates that (1) the actual methods used to estimate the equivalent circulating density window are not rigorous enough; (2) there still exist a lot of uncertainties when predicting the tubular standoff; (3) modeling fluid contamination, especially when the fluids are not compatible, remains very cumbersome, if not impossible, because the true interfaces’ physics is not completely considered; (4) a local contamination observed at an intermediate time can disappear at the end of the simulation due to numerical diffusion, meaning that just looking at the concentration maps at the end of placement is not sufficient to judge the efficiency of a displacement scenario; and (5) changes in geometries along the cement sheath are not considered with precision. This work allows establishing guidelines to help understanding how to manage simulation inputs and analyzing and communicating the produced results.

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3