Polymer Solution Preparation and Quality Control at Milne Point
Author:
Aitkulov Almas1, Redwine Connor1, Alvord Jeremy1, Edwards Reid1, Seright R. S.2
Affiliation:
1. Hilcorp Alaska, LLC, Anchorage, Alaska, USA 2. New Mexico Tech, Socorro, New Mexico, USA
Abstract
Abstract
This paper focuses on solution preparation and quality control activities associated with the Milne Point polymer flood on the North Slope of Alaska. This project uses ten different polymer injection locations with a variety of skid types and configurations, which had a notable impact on polymer quality control and dissolution operations. Compared with bulk 500-750-kg polymer bags, silos greatly improved the storage capacity and increased the overall quality of polymer wetting in system. Silos also required less physical effort when transferring polymer. Polymer hydration skids that were made inhouse by the polymer supplier were more reliable and experienced fewer polymer solution quality and startup issues than those that were outsourced. These inhouse skids also used a uniform programming software that made it relatively easy to train the operators on new hydration skids. For pumping polymer mother solution, triplex pumps provided the best run time and were most maintenance-friendly, compared with diaphragm or triple screw pumps. Although polymer solutions could be prepared that met our target viscosities without using a nitrogen blanket, corrosion and iron particulates raised substantial reliability and injectivity concerns if nitrogen blanketing was not used—especially when using black iron piping and when the make-up water contained dissolved iron. Inline static mixers were ineffective in mixing mother solution with dilution water when the mixing occurred close to the wellhead. Mixing the two streams too close to the wellhead led to substantial variations in wellhead viscosity measurements. Dedicating individual pumps for injection into a given well provided desirable flexibility in controlling rates and concentrations of polymer for the well. Monitoring produced salinity and polymer concentration provided useful insights about improved sweep and polymer retention associated with the polymer flood. The observed field behavior was consistent with laboratory studies indicating a "tailing" phenomenon associated with polymer retention at Milne Point.
Reference50 articles.
1. Agrawal, N., Chapman, T., Baid, R., Singh, R., Kumar, S., Sahil, K., MalayK., Kolay, J., Ghosh, P., Das, J., Khare, S., Kumar, P., AggarwalS.
2019. ESP Performance Monitoring and Diagnostics for Production Optimization in Polymer Flooding: A Case Study of Mangala Field. Paper presented at theSPE Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition, Mumbai, India, April 2019. doi: 10.2118/194656-MS. 2. Aitkulov, A., Edwards, R., Redwine, C., Cunha, K.
2024a. Milne Point Field Polymer Flood Update and Further Expansion. Paper SPE 218269 presented at theSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Tulsa, Oklahoma. 23-25 April. doi: 10.2118/218269-MS. 3. Aitkulov, A., Edwards, R., Dean, R.M.
2024b. Quantifying Polymer Injectivity and Performance in The Milne Point Oil Field. Paper SPE 218227 presented at theSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Tulsa, Oklahoma. 23-25 April. doi: 10.2118/218227-MS. 4. Experimental Investigation on Separation Behavior of Heavy Oil Emulsion for Polymer Flooding On Alaska North Slope;Chang;SPE Production & Operations,2020 5. Emulsification Characteristics and Electrolyte-Optimized Demulsification of Produced Liquid from Polymer Flooding On Alaska North Slope;Chang;SPE Production & Operations,2022
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|