Robust Waterflooding Optimization of Multiple Geological Scenarios

Author:

Essen G. M. van1,Zandvliet M. J.1,Hof P. M. J. Van den1,Bosgra O. H.1,Jansen J. D.2

Affiliation:

1. Delft University of Technology

2. Delft University of Technology and Shell International E&P

Abstract

Summary Dynamic optimization of waterflooding using optimal control theory has significant potential to increase ultimate recovery, as has been shown in various studies. However, optimal control strategies often lack robustness to geological uncertainties. We present an approach to reduce the effect of geological uncertainties in the field-development phase known as robust optimization (RO). RO uses a set of realizations that reflect the range of possible geological structures honoring the statistics of the geological uncertainties. In our study, we used 100 realizations of a 3D reservoir in a fluvial depositional environment with known main-flow direction. We optimized the rates of the eight injection and four production wells over the life of the reservoir, with the objective to maximize the average net present value (NPV). We used a gradient-based optimization method in which the gradients are obtained with an adjoint formulation. We compared the results of the RO procedure to two alternative approaches: a nominal-optimization (NO) and a reactive-control approach. In the reactive approach, each production well is shut in when production is no longer profitable. The NO procedure is based on a single realization. In our study, the NO procedure is performed on each of the 100 realizations in the set individually, resulting in 100 different NO-production strategies. The control strategies were applied to each realization, from which the average NPVs, the standard deviation, the cumulative-distribution functions, and the probability-density functions were determined. The RO results displayed a much smaller variance than the alternatives, indicating an increased robustness to geological uncertainty. Moreover, the RO procedure significantly improved the expected NPV compared to the alternative methods (on average 9.5% higher than using reactive-control and 5.9% higher than the average of the NO strategies).

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Subject

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Energy Engineering and Power Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3