Enhancing Short-Term Production Forecast in Oil Fields: Integrating Data-Driven and Model-Based Approaches to Reduce Uncertainty

Author:

Gonçalves M. M.1,Werneck R.1,Castro M.1,Amaral M.1,Mendes P. Ribeiro1,Filho L. A. Lusquino2,Esmin A.3,Moura R.1,Morais E.1,Linares O. C.1,Lustosa A.1,Salavati S.1,Schiozer D. J.1,Ferreira A. Mello1,Rocha A.1,Davolio A.1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Estadual de Campinas

2. São Paulo State University

3. Federal University of Lavras

Abstract

Abstract Reservoir simulation models are usually applied to optimize oil field production across its life cycle but face challenges in short-term forecasting. Data-driven techniques (DD) show promise for short-term predictions but lack reliability over extended periods. This study introduces a Hybrid Methodology (HyM) combining the optimal features of model-based (MB) with DD approaches to select the best simulation models to make short-term decisions, effectively reducing uncertainty in short-term production forecasts for a real field. Using DD techniques, such as Transformers, we forecast 150 days of cumulative water, oil, and gas production for each well of a real field based only on historical production. We also run production forecasts using 200 history-matched simulation models for this field. In our HyM methodology, we propose to select the best simulation models according to their fit to the DD forecasts, assuming the DD forecasts to be more representative of the short-term behavior of the real field. We compare our HyM to a conventional MB model selection based on history-matching quality, referred to as MB. The proposed approach was applied to a heavy oil field from the Campos basin (Brazil), a deep-water turbiditic reservoir. We separated five months of real history data as the ground truth to rank the selected models through the forecast error and rank similarity. With this evaluation, we measured how accurate the forecast of the chosen simulation models was and the efficacy of each approach (HyM and MB) in ranking the simulation models. Our results showed that the subset of models selected using HyM successfully outperformed those chosen by the MB approach since they are better fitted for short-term forecasts for oil, water, and gas rates. The proposed HyM method yields a 75% error reduction, considering the rank similarity, with respect to the MB approach. Consequently, we conclude that better results may be achieved by using a DD forecast as a reference to reduce the uncertainty of oil, water, and gas rates (HyM approach) instead of using the actual history (MB approach). The new methodology showed promising results by selecting models with attenuated errors for oil/water rates during the history-forecast transition, complementing the data assimilation procedure. This study presents an innovative methodology merging the strengths of machine learning (ML) and simulation models to enhance the reliability of short-term production forecasts. The proposed approach is versatile, not tied to any specific ML algorithm, and effectively minimizes uncertainties, particularly in complex fields with numerous wells.

Publisher

SPE

Reference18 articles.

1. Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting;Lim;International Journal of Forecasting,2021

2. Ashish Vaswani , NoamShazeer, NikiParmar, JakobUszkoreit, LlionJones, AidanN. Gomez, LukaszKaiser, and IlliaPolosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'17).Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 6000–6010.

3. Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation;Alexandre;Computers & Geosciences,2013

4. Cao, Q., Banerjee, R., Gupta, S., Li, J., Zhou, W., Jeyachandra, B. 2016. Data driven production forecasting using machine learning. Presented at the SPE Argentina Exploration and Production of Unconventional Resources Symposium, Buenos Aires, Argentina, June. https://doi.org/10.2118/180984-MS

5. A review on closed-loop field development and management;Mirzaei-Paiaman;Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3