Vertical Lift Models Substantiated by Statfjord Field Data

Author:

Fevang Øivind1,Fossmark Marthe Gilje1,Nordaas Kulkarni Kari1,Lauritsen Håvard Thomassen1,Skjaeveland Svein M.2

Affiliation:

1. Statoil

2. UIS

Abstract

Abstract The Statfjord field entered into the blow down phase after 30 years of production. Production of injection gas and gas liberated from residual oil is the main production target in this phase. In some areas, the gas cap has been produced and the wells are producing mainly water until the solution gas is mobilized. These wells have gone through large changes in gas-liquid-ratio (GLR) and water-cut (WCT). Production tests from wells located in such areas have been used when analyzing the ability of multiphase-flow correlations to model vertical lift performance (VLP). Accurate modeling of the VLP is critical to predict a realistic production rate during the blow down phase. Measured wellhead (THP) and downhole pressures from about 80 production tests, from four wells, were used to analyze the accuracy of VLP correlations at widely varying flow conditions (GLR, WCT, and THP). Altogether 17 multiphase pressure drop correlations incorporated in the program Prosper were tested by comparing observed and calculated downhole pressures. Based on the production tests the ability of the different correlations to predict the VLP varies with the following top 4: Hagedorn Brown, Petroleum Experts, Petroleum Experts 2, and Petroleum Experts 3. These correlations are recommended if no measured data is available. In general a somewhat low pressure drop is predicted at low gas-liquid ratio (GLR), and a somewhat high pressure drop is predicted at high GLR. After tuning, accurate predictability was observed for the different correlations for limited ranges in GLR e.g. 50-300 Sm3/Sm3. However, for larger ranges in GLR it was not possible to achieve an accurate VLP correlation, even after tuning. Hagedorn Brown and Petroleum experts seem to be the most accurate correlations for a wide range of producing GLR. The error in the predicted production performance when a single VLP correlation is used can be substantial for highly productive wells with large variations in producing GLR. It is recommended to shift the tuning following the GLR development.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Sensitivity Analysis of Choke Size Selections on Reservoir Pressure Drawdown Using Prosper Modelling for Reservoir Management;Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023;2023-07-30

2. A Machine Learning Approach to Select Production Tubing Size for Oil Wells;Proceeding of International Conference on Computational Science and Applications;2022

3. Sensitivity Analysis of Multiphase Flow in a well Using PROSPER;International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa;2020-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3