State of the Art Screen Selection for Standalone Screen Applications

Author:

Chanpura R. A.1,Hodge R. M.2,Andrews J. S.3,Toffanin E. P.1,Moen T..1,Parlar M..1

Affiliation:

1. Schlumberger

2. ConocoPhillips

3. Statoil

Abstract

Abstract Standalone screens (SAS) in openhole can provide highly reliable sand control completions at a lower cost and with less operational complexity than other openhole sand control completions as well as long term productivity performance comparable to other openhole completions, when applied in the "right environment with the right procedures." Although many in the industry would agree with the preceding statement, there is no consensus on what the right environment is and what the right procedures are. Even when there is agreement on the applicability of SAS for a particular sand size distribution, there are considerable differences in the recommended screen type and screen opening between various laboratories. In this paper we critically review the various laboratory testing procedures used in the industry and the interpretations made to evaluate screen performance and screen selection for SAS applications. We demonstrate that the way some of the laboratory tests are performed are biased towards one type of screen (wire wrap) and some are interpreted without sufficient information such that they almost always favor another type of screen (premium mesh). We show that severe screen plugging with clean formation sand is almost never an issue and that the probability of screen plugging due to other factors can be minimized when proper precautions are taken. We propose that screen candidates for standalone screen applications be initially selected based on sand retention performance, with the final selection confirmed based on flow capacity. In addition, based on ~ 185 laboratory tests performed on various types of wire wrap (6 to 16 gauge) and premium mesh (60 to 600 µm) screens for unconsolidated sands and using a set criterion for sand retention, we conclude that many of the currently used criteria in the industry for selection between gravel packing and SAS are highly conservative, and unduly limit the possible application of standalone screens.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3