Affiliation:
1. Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
Abstract
The paper reports on the outcomes of research carried out at a North Macedonian public university aimed at developing the language competences of prospective EFL teachers through formative assessment. For the study’s purposes, a CEFR-based assessment tool was designed for teacher, peer and self-assessment of the ETP (English-for-teaching purposes) competences of fourth year student–teachers (n=15) micro-teaching lower year students. Fluency, accuracy, interaction, stimulating the development of ideas, and addressing audiences were the formative assessment criteria used to check if there was progress from the first to the third micro-teaching session as a result of formative feedback and assessment training. Additionally, two surveys for student-teachers and peer-assessors were used aimed at exploring: a) the effects of formative feedback on students’ language competences and teaching skills; b) the effects of formative assessment training on students’ peer- and self-assessment skills; and c) the professional and personal benefits of formative assessment training for students. Apart from many personal benefits from the project, findings revealed positive effects of formative assessment on students’ language competences and teaching skills; specifically on the awareness of the complexity of ETP competences and the skills for tackling various classroom, assessment and material design challenges.
Publisher
Konstantin Preslavsky University of Shumen
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Metals and Alloys,Strategy and Management,Mechanical Engineering
Reference52 articles.
1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, M: Pearson Education Group.
2. Andrade, H., & Boulay, B. A. (2003). The role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309596625.
3. Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928.
4. Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27(2), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x.
5. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: School of Education King’s College.