Affiliation:
1. Department of City & Regional Planning, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Pakistan
Abstract
Discipline of urban planning only developed around a century back with the first academic school at the University of Liverpool in 1909. However, the theory of this discipline is relatively older and might date to varying timelines around various parts of the world. However, modern urban planning discipline has got birth in the US and Western Europe. Early development in the theory of urban planning develops challenges for the cities. In response to such challenges, the planning approaches seem to adapt to the needs of emerging regimes evident from the high-scale urban renovation of Paris by Haussmann. This is called the Progressive Model of Planning wherein planners of the time struggled to deal with the challenges imparted by the Industrial Revolution through scientific and engineering-based knowledge. Early urban planning efforts were mostly anarchist movements that reacted to the social issues of the time and include Garden City, Radiant City, Broadacre, etc. This study sought to present these theoretical considerations with respect to certain development classifications in urban planning. Accordingly, the methodology of the research study comprises the following sections/segments for a better understanding of urban planning at different times: i. Pre-History of Urban Planning ii. Foundational Years iii. Modernism (Rational Planning) iv. Post Modernism (Post war suburbia) v. Current Era In short, it is concluded that cities have emerged as a result of conscious decisions. Accordingly, looking into the planning theory requires due consideration of the planning approaches utilized over time. This perceives that planning theory is essentially the study of the decisions made from intuition and that is equally right because planning theory and practice development are in parallel.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Software
Reference91 articles.
1. S. Campbell and S. S. Fainstein, “Introduction: The Structure and Debates of Planning Theory,” in Readings in Planning Theory, 4th ed., S. S. Fainstein and J. DeFilippis, Eds. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell, 1996, pp. 1–16.
2. M. Westin, “The framing of power in communicative planning theory : Analysing the work of John Forester , Patsy Healey and Judith Innes,” vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 132–154, 2022, doi: 10.1177/14730952211043219.
3. F. Choay, The Modern City: Planning in the 19th Century, 1st ed. New York: George Braziller, 1969.
4. P. Hall, Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
5. R. Fishman, Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Le Corbusier. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献