Doctors’ Adherence to the Guidelines on the Oral Anticoagulants Usage

Author:

Perepech N. B.1,Mikhailova I. E.1,Tregubov A. V.1

Affiliation:

1. Saint-Petersburg State University

Abstract

Aim. To study doctors’ knowledge of the clinical guidelines on the use of oral anticoagulants and identify the reasons for poor adherence.Material and methods. The results of the 218 questionnaires completed by the doctors trained in the 2018-2019 were analyzed. The questionnaire included 12 items regarding the main aspects of oral anticoagulants use. 71.6% of respondents were cardiologists, 18.8% were therapists (including general practitioners) and 9.6% were representatives of other specialties.Results. The obtained data show that therapists are worse than cardiologists aware of indications for oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation, and do not always correctly assess the risk of thromboembolism. Only 24.4% of therapists consider prescribing rivaroxaban in a dose of 2.5 mg 2 times a day to a patient suffering from myocardial infarction with an ST segment elevation on the electrocardiogram. One third of therapists either do not know or do not support current recommendations regarding oral anticoagulants use in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. 65.3% cardiologists are inclined to start anticoagulant therapy only in patients at high risk for thromboembolism, while 36.6% therapists are ready to start such treatment even at moderate risk. Respondents' answers to the questionnaire demonstrate their great alertness regarding possible bleeding. Overestimation of the bleeding risk is more often among therapists than cardiologists (44.9% and 17.1%, respectively). More than one third of therapists (36.6%) are ready to recommend a reduced dose of oral anticoagulant to patients without clear reasons. Fear of bleeding has a greater influence on the decision to prescribe an anticoagulant and the choice of treatment regimen for atrial fibrillation than the desire to effectively prevent thromboembolism.Conclusion. The results of the survey show that the doctors’ adherence to the clinical guidelines’ basic principles of the use of oral anticoagulants among cardiologists is higher than that of therapists. Wherein, even among cardiologists it cannot be considered sufficient. The lack of doctors’ awareness about the identification, assessment, and modification of risk factors for bleeding was revealed.

Publisher

Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniyaizdat

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference9 articles.

1. Ibanez B., James S., Agewall S., et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2017;00:1-66. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.

2. Valgimigli M., Bueno H., Byrne R.A., et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2017;00:1-48. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.

3. Steffel J., Verhamme P., Potpara T.S., et al. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(16):1330-93. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy136.

4. Knuuti J., Wijns W., Saraste A., et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2019;00:1-71. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.

5. Konstantinides S.V., Meyer G., Becattini C., et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2019;00:1-61. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3