Problematic issues and development of classifications of the main parameters of quality and adherence to pharmacotherapy. Part II: physician adherence to clinical guidelines and official drug labels

Author:

Lukina Yu. V.1ORCID,Kutishenko N. P.1ORCID,Martsevich S. Yu.1ORCID,Drapkina O. M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Abstract

The second publication is presented, devoted to the classification of the main parameters of quality and adherence to pharmacotherapy. Despite the fact that patients play a central role in the problem of medical adherence, the role of attending physicians is extremely significant both in prescribing/non-prescribing proven effective and safe therapy, and in influencing patient medical adherence. This led to the identification of a special commitment type — the physician adherence to the basic principles of rational treatment. Collection, analysis and systematization of information, as well as the related development of a classification of physician adherence/non-adherence were the aim of this review and analytical work. We searched data using keywords among Russian and English-­language sources. When compiling the classification, categories of adherence/non-adherence were identified in accordance with the implementation by physicians of the main provisions of clinical guidelines for long-term therapy for patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs), as well as following official drug labels reflecting data on clinical pharmacology, the main side effects, drug-drug interactions. The classification of physician adherence/non-adherence to implementing the principles of rational treatment of patients with NCDs can be used in the development of electronic medical decision support systems for providing therapy with proven effectiveness and safety in specific clinical situations. In addition, on the basis of the developed classification, checklists for monitoring by healthcare specialists of the implementation of the rational treatment of patients with chronic NCDs should be created.

Publisher

Silicea - Poligraf, LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3