Who is an expert? A corpus-assisted analysis of the expert in Swedish Covid-19 discourse

Author:

Ängsal Magnus P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Göteborgs universitet Institutionen för språk och litteraturer

Abstract

This article explores a prevalent thematic strand of the Swedish public discourse on Covid-19 pandemic strategies. Analyzing the construction and role of the expert as it has been played out in the news media coverage of Covid-19 in four leading Swedish daily newspapers throughout the first two months of the pandemic in 2020 (February and March), the contribution asks who counts as a trustworthy expert, and to what extent such ascriptions are used in debates about the Swedish coronavirus strategy, which has aroused much interest and criticism. One of the important findings is the concept of a reliable and rational expert who is, primarily, a Swedish epidemiologist. Also noteworthy is the fact that the role of the expert and the very word expert seem to be under negotiation. This contribution is situated within the framework of discourse linguistics and explores segments of discourse understood as collectively shared knowledge. A partly corpus-assisted methodology is used. The study aims to link linguistic utterances on the expert’s role in the pandemic with the level of important social actors in the course of the pandemic in Sweden.

Publisher

University of Warsaw

Reference44 articles.

1. Andersen Christiane et al. (2018): Erkenntnis als soziale Praxis. Ludwik Flecks Wissenschaftstheorie aus sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht. In: Andersen Christiane, Fix Ulla, Schiewe Jürgen (eds.): Denkstile in der deutschen Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin, 11-65.

2. Attardo Salvatore (2000): Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32:6, 793-826.

3. Bjereld Ulf, Demker Marie (2020): Sanningen som politiskt slagfält. Stockholm.

4. Bubenhofer Noah et al. (2020): Von Grenzen und Welten. Eine korpuspragmatische Analyse COVID-19-Diskursanalyse. Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur, 16:2/3, 156-165.

5. Ekengren Oscarssson Henrik (2013): Väljare är inga dumbommar. Politologerna. Statsvetenskaplig analys av svensk politik. Available: https://politologerna.wordpress.com/2013/12/10/valjare-ar-inga-dumbommar/ [retrieved 12 January 2021].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3