Abstract
The present study was carried out to evaluate the substitution of synthetic performance enhancers by ethanolic propolis extract (EPE) in the diet of broilers and their effects on performance, carcass yield, noble cuts, viscera and bed quality. A completely randomized design was used, with four treatments and six replicates each, totaling 24 experimental plots with 20 birds each. The experimental treatments were: negative control, without the inclusion of performance improvement and EPE-free; positive control, containing avilamycin performance enhancer; Inclusion of 0.1% of EPE and; Inclusion of 0.2% EPE. The analyzed data were submitted to analysis of variance and applied the SNK test at 5% probability. There was no effect of the inclusion of additives on feed intake and feed conversion in the periods from 1 to 7, 1 to 21, and from 1 to 42 days of age. Weight gain was lower in birds receiving feed with the inclusion of 0.1% EPE in the period from 1 to 7 days, not differing from the other treatments in the other evaluation periods. Carcass characteristics, cuts, and viscera and bed moisture were not influenced by the treatments used. The inclusion of ethanol extract from propolis as a performance enhancer up to 42 days of age provided similar results to the use of performance enhancers based on avilamycin, thus being an efficient substitute in poultry production.
Publisher
Universidade Estadual de Maringa
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Abudabos, A. M., Alyemni, A. H., Dafalla, Y. M., & Khan, R. U. (2016). The effect of phytogenic feed additives to substitute in-feed antibiotics on growth traits and blood biochemical parameters in broiler chicks challenged with Salmonella typhimurium. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(23), 24151-24157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7665-2
2. Alani, A. A. T., Alheeti, A. S. A., & Alani, E. N. S. (2019). Comparison between effect of adding propolis and antibiotic in in broiler chickens on productive performance and carcass traits. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 388, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012032
3. Ali, A., Rane, A. S., Haq, Z., Khan, N., Bala, S., Gupta, M., & Wani, J. M. (2017). Comparative effect of polyherbal agents and organic acid to substitute antibiotic growth promoters in broilers for combating drus resistance. Environment and Ecology, 35(1A), 372-376. Retrieved from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20173068146
4. Araujo, R. G. A. C., Polycarpo, G. V., Barbieri, A., Silva, K. M., Ventura, G., & Polycarpo, V. C. C. (2019). Performance and economic viability of broiler chickens fed with probiotic and organic acids in an attempt to replace growth-promoting antibiotics. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 21(2), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0912
5. Bailey, C. A. (2020). Precision poultry nutrition and feed formulation. In Animal Agriculture Academic Press, 367-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00021-5