CHANGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ASIAN “ECONOMIC GIANTS” IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GEOECOLOGICAL TRANSITION

Author:

ALEKSEEVA N.N.1,LOPATNIKOV D.L.2,BANCHEVA A.I.1

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University

2. Institute of Geography of Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Since the end of the last century the epicenter of environmental problems and global environmental threats has moved to Asia. Three economic giants played the main role: at first Japan, then China and India. In recent decades increasingly complicated and multidirectional environmentally significant processes have taken place in these Asian countries, which are at different stages of socio-economic development. The purpose of the study was to identify the main trends in the basic environmental characteristics of Japan, China and India and study the dynamics of their position in the context of the geoecological transition. The work was based on the concepts of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) and the geoecological transition of D.L. Lopatnikov. Comparison of environmental and economic parameters was carried out on the basis of statistical data from the World Bank, OECD and national databases. Time series for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and carbon dioxide emissions were analyzed mainly for the period 1990-2020. The dynamics of the countries’ position on the curve over a 30-year period makes it possible to identify the trajectories of their environmental development, as well as determine prospects for the short-term future. According to the dynamics of key indicators, Japan is steadily on a downward segment of the curve, while China and India are on a downward segment for some indicators, having passed an inflection point during the period under study, and on an upward segment for other ones. The interpretation of dynamics of the environmental indicators revealed the main factors (economic, institutional, technological, etc.) which lay behind their environmental advancement. At the same time, the economic slowdown during the 2008-2009 global economic crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic had a different impact on the key indicators of the three countries. The position of countries in the international environmental ratings correlates with the level of socio-economic development, which fits into the logic of the EKC. While the first signs of a turn towards the greener economy are already visible in China, the same is still not true for India. The environmentally positive trends which were identified for the economic giants of Asia, with the exception of Japan, cannot yet be considered a long-term trend due to the relatively short series of data and the continuing diversity of their environmental prospects.

Funder

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Russian Academy of Sciences

Publisher

Moscow University Press

Reference44 articles.

1. 1. Alekseeva N.N., Arshinova M.A., Bancheva A.I. Polozhenie Rossii v mezhdunarodnykh ekologicheskikh reitingakh [Position of Russia in International Environmental Ratings], Vestnik RUDN, Seriya: Ekologiya i bezopasnost’ zhiznedeyatel’nosti, 2018, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 134-152, https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2310-2018-26-1-134-152. (In Russian)

2. 2. Alekseeva N.N., Fortygina E.A. Klimaticheskii vektor ekologo-ekonomicheskoi modernizatsii Kitaya [The Climatic Vector of Ecological and Economic Modernization of China], Aziya i Afrika segodnya, 2022, no. 9, p. 37-45, https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750018521-5. (In Russian)

3. 3. Bancheva A.I. Geoekologicheskoe sostoyanie landshaftov ostrova Khokkaido (Yaponiya) [Geoecological Assessment of the Hokkaido Island landscapes (Japan)], PhD Thesis in Geography, Moscow, 2018, 130 p. (In Russian)

4. 4. Bityukova V.R., Popov A.A. Ekologicheskie posledstviya strukturnyh sdvigov v promyshlennosti Rossii v 1990-2014 gg. [Environmental consequences of structural changes in Russian industry in 1990-2014], Ekologiya i promyshlennost’ Rossii, 2015, no. 6, p. 4-10. (In Russian)

5. 5. Dahiya S., Anhauser L., Farrow A. et al. Global SO2 emission hotspot database. The world’s worst sources of SO2 pollution, Greenpeace Environment Trust, 2019, 39 r.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3