Minimum clinically important difference of the health-related quality of life scales in adult spinal deformity calculated by latent class analysis: is it appropriate to use the same values for surgical and nonsurgical patients?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Minimum clinically important difference of the health-related quality of life scales in adult spinal deformity calculated by latent class analysis: is it appropriate to use the same values for surgical and nonsurgical patients?

Published:2019-01 Issue:1 Volume:19 Page:71-78
ISSN:1529-9430
Container-title:The Spine Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:The Spine Journal

Author:

Yuksel Selcen,Ayhan Selim,Nabiyev Vugar,Domingo-Sabat Montse,Vila-Casademunt Alba^ORCID,Obeid Ibrahim,Perez-Grueso Francisco Sanchez,Acaroglu Emre^ORCID

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability;Bridwell;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2005

2. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire;Fairbank;Physiotherapy,1980

3. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a responsive instrument for assessing the outcome of treatment for adult spinal deformity;Mannion;Eur Spine J,2016

4. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36;Walsh;Spine,2003

5. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference;Jaeschke;Controll Clin Trials,1989

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The minimal important change is not a universal fixed value across diagnoses when using the FAOS and FAAM in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery;Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;2024-06-11

2. Calculation of the minimal clinically important difference in operated patients with adult spine deformity: advantages of the ROC method and significance of prevalence in threshold selection;European Spine Journal;2024-06-06

3. Responsiveness and minimal important change of the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16);Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes;2024-03-26

4. Long-term Outcomes After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Lateral Interbody Fusion;Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication;2024-02-16

5. Influence of smoking on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score‐matched analysis;Spine Deformity;2024-02-08