Re-measuring left–right: A comparison of SEM and Bayesian measurement models for extracting left–right party placements-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Re-measuring left–right: A comparison of SEM and Bayesian measurement models for extracting left–right party placements

Published:2009-09 Issue:3 Volume:28 Page:413-421
ISSN:0261-3794
Container-title:Electoral Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:Electoral Studies

Author:

Bakker Ryan

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference37 articles.

1. Partisan voting and multiparty spatial competition: the pressure for responsible parties;Adams;Journal of Theoretical Politics,1998

2. Armstrong, D., Bakker, R. Take that you lousy dimension: an assessment of the multi-dimensionality of manifesto-based left-right placements. Political Analysis, forthcoming.

3. Armstrong, D., Duch, R., Bakker, R., 2007. Accounting for error in models with estimated variables. Working paper.

4. Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Netjes, C. Fickle parties or changing dimensions? Testing the comparability of party manifesto data across time and space. Political Analysis, forthcoming.

5. A spatial bargaining theory of government formation in parliamentary systems;Baron;American Journal of Political Science,1991

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. STATE INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITIES IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: AN EXPERIENCE OF BAYESIAN AGGREGATION OF STATE CAPACITY INDEX;SRAVN POLIT;2022

2. Religious ideology and terrorism in Africa;Managing Violent Religious Extremism in Fragile States;2021-09-17

3. Scaling hand-coded political texts to learn more about left-right policy content;Party Politics;2021-08-05

4. Rebel Rivalry and the Strategic Nature of Rebel Group Ideology and Demands;Journal of Conflict Resolution;2020-10-23

5. Measurement Uncertainty in Spatial Models: A Bayesian Dynamic Measurement Model;Political Analysis;2018-11-09