Rebel Rivalry and the Strategic Nature of Rebel Group Ideology and Demands

Author:

Tokdemir Efe1ORCID,Sedashov Evgeny2ORCID,Ogutcu-Fu Sema Hande3ORCID,Leon Carlos E. Moreno4,Berkowitz Jeremy5,Akcinaroglu Seden6

Affiliation:

1. Department of International Relations, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey

2. School of Politics and Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

3. Department of History, Political Science, and Philosophy, Lincoln University, PA, USA

4. Department of Political Studies, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia

5. Division of Social Work, Behavioral and Political Sciences, Prairie View A&M University, TX, USA

6. Department of Political Science, Binghamton University, NY, USA

Abstract

How does the presence of multiple combatants affect rebel groups’ ideological and demand positioning? Although violent forms of inter-group conflict have been widely studied in the civil war literature, rebel groups’ strategic use of ideology and demands has received scarce scholarly attention. We argue that the pressure of competition forces rebel groups to differentiate themselves ideologically and demand-wise from their rivals to maximize their chances of survival and success. Rebel groups strive to set themselves apart by offering unique products to their supporters and recruits. Thus, we contend that rebel groups are more likely to modify their ideologies and demands from the government in the face of competition from rival groups. We test this theory using novel data collected from rebel group manifestos and public statements. Our findings suggest that groups are more likely to shift their ideology and modify their demands as the number of rival groups increases.

Funder

Young Scientist Award (BAGEP) of The Science Academy, Turkey

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,General Business, Management and Accounting

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Appendix;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13

2. Women’s Inclusion and Political Violence;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13

3. Solving the Concept Stretching Problem;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13

4. Notes;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13

5. Conclusion;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3