How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality

Published:2020-03 Issue:2 Volume:60 Page:120-127
ISSN:1355-0306
Container-title:Science & Justice
language:en
Short-container-title:Science & Justice

Author:

Kelley Sharon,Gardner Brett O.,Murrie Daniel C.,Pan Karen D.H.,Kafadar Karen

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Fingerprint error rates and proficiency tests: what they are and why they matter;Koehler;Hastings Law Journal,2008

2. Intuitive error rate estimates for the forensic sciences;Koehler;Jurimetrics,2017

3. Mnookin, J.L., 2008. Of black boxes, instruments, and experts: Testing the validity of forensic science. Episteme J. Soc. Epistemol. 5, 343–358.

4. Evaluating and challenging forensic identification evidence;Tobin;Champion,2006

5. National Commission on Forensic Science, 2016a. Proficiency testing in forensic science. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/archives/ncfs/page/file/831806/download, 1–6.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Perceptions of blind proficiency testing among latent print examiners;Science & Justice;2023-03

2. Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory;Science & Justice;2023-01

3. Planning and developing a method for collecting ground truth data relating to footwear mark evidence;Science & Justice;2022-09

4. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance;Forensic Science International;2021-07

5. Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination;Forensic Science International;2020-10