Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination

Published:2020-10 Issue: Volume:315 Page:110433
ISSN:0379-0738
Container-title:Forensic Science International
language:en
Short-container-title:Forensic Science International

Author:

Crozier William E.^ORCID,Kukucka Jeff^ORCID,Garrett Brandon L.^ORCID

Funder

Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Law

Reference43 articles.

1. The costs and benefits of forensics;Garrett;Houst. Law Rev.,2020

2. Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-comparison Methods;President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology,2016

3. The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence;Mitchell;Behav. Sci. Law,2019

4. Census of Publicly Funded Crime Laboratories;US Department of Justice,2014

5. The proficiency of experts;Garrett;Univ. Law Rev.,2018

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The effect of following best practice reporting recommendations on legal and community evaluations of forensic examiners reports;Forensic Science International;2024-06

2. EEG Lie Detection Evidence and Potential Australian Jurors;Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology;2024-04-17

3. A transparent approach: Openness in forensic science reporting;Forensic Science International: Synergy;2024

4. Interpol review of toxicology 2019–2022;Forensic Science International: Synergy;2023

5. Growing pains of addressing cognitive bias in legal contexts: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022);Legal and Criminological Psychology;2022-12-21