Why plaintiffs' counsel challenge tests, and how they can successfully challenge the theory of “validity generalization”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Why plaintiffs' counsel challenge tests, and how they can successfully challenge the theory of “validity generalization”

Published:1988-12 Issue:3 Volume:33 Page:331-364
ISSN:0001-8791
Container-title:Journal of Vocational Behavior
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Vocational Behavior

Author:

Seymour Richard T

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Life-span and Life-course Studies,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology,Education

Reference54 articles.

1. Adams v. Dan River Mills, C.A. No. 69-C-58-D (W.D.Va.).

2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975).

3. Occupational validity of the General Aptitude Test Battery;Bemis;Journal of Applied Psychology,1968

4. Black Law Enforcement Officers v. City of Akron, 40 BNA FEP Cases 322 (N.D.Ohio, 1986), aff'd in relevant part and rev'd in other part, 824 F.2d 475 (6th Cir., 1987).

5. Legal and policy aspects of testing;Bolick;Journal of Vocational Behavior,1988

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hocus-pocus and hydraulics functions: Anything not worth doing is not worth doing well;Industrial and Organizational Psychology;2023-08-31

2. Is it also time to revisit situational specificity?;Industrial and Organizational Psychology;2023-08-31

3. Applicant Perceptions and Reactions to Selection;Selection and Recruitment in the Healthcare Professions;2018

4. Corrections for Criterion Reliability in Validity Generalization: A False Prophet in a Land of Suspended Judgment;Industrial and Organizational Psychology;2014-12

5. Corrections for Criterion Reliability in Validity Generalization: A False Prophet in a Land of Suspended Judgment;Industrial and Organizational Psychology;2014-12