On the assessment of cognitive style: a commentary on Peterson, Deary, and Austin-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the assessment of cognitive style: a commentary on Peterson, Deary, and Austin

Published:2003-04 Issue:5 Volume:34 Page:893-897
ISSN:0191-8869
Container-title:Personality and Individual Differences
language:en
Short-container-title:Personality and Individual Differences

Author:

Riding Richard J

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

General Psychology

Reference14 articles.

1. IQ, field-dependence–independence, and the development of formal operational thought;Flexer;Journal of General Psychology,1980

2. Cognitive style: five approaches and relevant research;Goldstein,1978

3. Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J., & Austin, E. J. (2002). The structure and reliability of Riding's 1991 Cognitive Styles Analysis test. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, –.

4. Riding, R. J. (1982). The effects of forced-retrieval, instruction and recall on the availability of information in long-term memory. Core, fiche 1, F8.

5. Cognitive Styles Analysis;Riding,1991

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Rasch Model Case Study: Investigating Cognitive Performances of School Children's Museum Learning Experiences;Manage Your Own Learning Analytics;2021-12-05

2. Cognitive Styles as Motivating Factors of Language Learners’ Metaphorical Competence: A Case Study Based on Riding’s CSA;Advances in Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems;2013

3. Efficient electronic navigation: A metaphorical question?;Interacting with Computers;2011-03

4. Scores From Riding's Cognitive Styles Analysis Have Poor Test–Retest Reliability;Teaching and Learning in Medicine;2008-07-14

5. Celebrating a common finding: Riding’s CSA test is unreliable;Personality and Individual Differences;2007-12