Nucleus Freedom North American Clinical Trial

Author:

Balkany Thomas12,Hodges Annelle12,Menapace Christine13,Hazard Linda13,Driscoll Colin14,Gantz Bruce15,Kelsall David16,Luxford William17,McMenomy Sean18,Neely J. Gail19,Peters Brian110,Pillsbury Harold111,Roberson Joseph112,Schramm David113,Telian Steven114,Waltzman Susan115,Westerberg Brian116,Payne Stacy117

Affiliation:

1. Rochester, and New York, NY; Jacksonville and Miami, FL

2. University of Miami Ear Institute, Miami, FL

3. Cochlear Americas, Denver, CO

4. Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

5. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

6. Rocky Mountain Ear Center, Denver, CO

7. House Ear Clinic, Los Angeles, CA

8. Oregon Health Science Center, Portland, OR

9. Washington University, St. Louis, MO

10. Dallas Otolaryngology Association, Dallas, TX

11. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

12. California Ear Institute, Palo Alto, CA

13. Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, Ottawa, Ontario

14. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

15. New York University, New York, NY

16. St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC

17. Nemours Clinic Jacksonville

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate hearing outcomes and effects of stimulation rate on performance with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant (Cochlear Americas, Denver, CO). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, controlled, prospective, single-blind clinical study using single-subject repeated measures (A-B-A-B) design at 14 academic centers in the United States and Canada and comparison with outcomes of a prior device by the same manufacturer. PATIENTS: Seventy-one severely/profoundly hearing impaired adults. RESULTS: Seventy-one adult recipients were randomly programmed in two different sets of rate: ACE or higher rate ACE RE. Mean scores for Consonant Nucleus Consonant words is 57%, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences in quiet 78%, and HINT sentences in noise 64%. Sixty-seven percent of subjects preferred slower rates of stimulation, and performance did not improve with higher rates of stimulation using this device. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects performed well, and there was no advantage to higher stimulation rates with this device. SIGNIFICANCE: Higher stimulation rates do not necessarily result in improved performance.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3