When two actions are easier than one: How inhibitory control demands affect response processing-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

When two actions are easier than one: How inhibitory control demands affect response processing

Published:2014-09 Issue: Volume:151 Page:230-236
ISSN:0001-6918
Container-title:Acta Psychologica
language:en
Short-container-title:Acta Psychologica

Author:

Huestegge Lynn,Koch Iring

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine

Reference36 articles.

1. Reconfiguration and the bottleneck: Does task switching affect the refractory-period effect?;Band;European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,2006

2. Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding saccades;Boucher;Psychological Review,2007

3. Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty;De Jong;Acta Psychologica,1995

4. Dual-task costs and benefits in anti-saccade performance;Evans;Experimental Brain Research,2010

5. Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck;Fagot;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1992

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Flipping the script: Action-plan modification during single- and multiple-action control;Acta Psychologica;2024-08

2. Erroneous saccade co-execution during manual action control is independent of oculomotor stimulus-response translation ease;Psychological Research;2024-07-30

3. Studying the Role of Visuospatial Attention in the Multi-Attribute Task Battery II;Applied Sciences;2024-04-09

4. Dual-Action Costs and Benefits in a Uni-Modal Single-Onset Paradigm;Experimental Psychology;2023-11

5. Hitchhiking actions: Erroneous saccade co-execution is independent of stimulus-response translation ease;2023-10-19