Comparative difficulty and the strategic regulation of accuracy: The impact of test-list context on monitoring and meta-metacognition-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative difficulty and the strategic regulation of accuracy: The impact of test-list context on monitoring and meta-metacognition

Published:2015-05 Issue: Volume:157 Page:155-163
ISSN:0001-6918
Container-title:Acta Psychologica
language:en
Short-container-title:Acta Psychologica

Author:

Arnold Michelle M.,Prike Toby

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. The importance of untangling subjective experience and objective measures for understanding memory performance;Arnold,2011

2. Monitoring and meta-metacognition in the own-race bias;Arnold;Acta Psychologica,2013

3. The influence of comparative difficulty of test questions on metacognition and corrected scores for formula-scored exams;Arnold,2014

4. A little bias goes a long way: The effects of feedback on the strategic regulation of accuracy on formula-scored tests;Arnold;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,2013

5. Remembering and knowing in context;Bodner;Journal of Memory and Language,2003

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “I can’t skip it”: does free report improve accuracy in false memories?;Memory;2021-03-12

2. Independent recollection/familiarity ratings can dissociate: Evidence from the effects of test context on recognition of event details.;Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale;2019-06

3. What's Context Got to Do with It? Comparative Difficulty of Test Questions Influences Metacognition and Corrected Scores for Formula-scored Exams;Applied Cognitive Psychology;2017-03

4. Meta-Cognitive Ability and Brain Damage in Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Case Report;Turkish Journal of Psychiatry;2017