Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: Experiences from conducting a mixed methods evaluation in the RUCAS programme-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: Experiences from conducting a mixed methods evaluation in the RUCAS programme

Published:2016-02 Issue: Volume:54 Page:144-151
ISSN:0149-7189
Container-title:Evaluation and Program Planning
language:en
Short-container-title:Evaluation and Program Planning

Author:

Makrakis Vassilios,Kostoulas-Makrakis Nelly

Funder

European Commission

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Strategy and Management,Geography, Planning and Development,Social Psychology,Business and International Management

Reference37 articles.

1. Critical skills survey;American Management Association,2010

2. What are 21st-century skills?;AT21CS,2012

3. The politics, fashions, and conventions of research methods;Bergmann;Journal of Mixed Methods Research,2011

4. Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices;Chase,2005

5. Designing and conducting mixed methods research;Creswell,2007

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Redefining STEAM to STEAM ∀H (STEAM for All Humanity) in Higher Education;Education Sciences;2024-08-15

2. Home Waste Audit: A Community Science Activity to Increase Waste Literacy and Reduce Household Waste;Community Science;2024-07-30

3. Critical implications of education for sustainable development in HEIs - A systematic review through the lens of the business science literature;The International Journal of Management Education;2024-03

4. Self-directed professional development used as intervention to enhance teachers’ curriculum as praxis;South African Journal of Education;2024-02-29

5. Embedding Sustainability Justice in Greek Secondary Curricula through the DeCoRe Plus Methodology;Knowledge;2023-10-17