Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: Addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: Addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations

Published:2010-10 Issue:2 Volume:85 Page:207-212
ISSN:0301-0511
Container-title:Biological Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Biological Psychology

Author:

Thorwart Anna,Glautier Steven,Lachnit Harald

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,General Neuroscience

Reference21 articles.

1. A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning;Brandon;Behavioural Brain Research,2000

2. An analysis of synthetic processing of odor mixtures in the honeybee (Apis mellefera);Chandra;Journal of Experimental Biology,1998

3. Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking;De Houwer;Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2002

4. A modified version of the unique-cue theory accounts for olfactory compound processing in honeybees;Deisig;Learning and Memory,2003

5. Spatial separation of target and competitor cues enhances blocking of human causality judgements;Glautier;Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2002

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Awareness and differential eyeblink conditioning: effects of manipulating auditory CS frequencies;Learning & Memory;2020-01-16

2. Eyeblink conditioning with a noise burst as unconditioned stimulus;PSICOTHEMA;2017

3. Common elements enhance or retard negative patterning discrimination learning depending on modality of stimuli;Learning and Motivation;2013-02

4. Revisiting the learning curve (once again);Frontiers in Psychology;2013

5. Generalization decrements: Further support for flexibility in stimulus processing;Learning & Behavior;2010-11-01