Weed-suppressive bacteria effects differ in culture compared to in soils and with or without microbial competition and separation of active ingredient-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Weed-suppressive bacteria effects differ in culture compared to in soils and with or without microbial competition and separation of active ingredient

Published:2021-01 Issue: Volume:152 Page:104422
ISSN:1049-9644
Container-title:Biological Control
language:en
Short-container-title:Biological Control

Author:

Lazarus Brynne E.,Feris Kevin,Germino Matthew J.

Funder

USGS

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Insect Science,Agronomy and Crop Science

Reference25 articles.

1. Toxin production by a rhizobacterial Pseudomonas sp. that inhibits wheat root growth;Bolton;Plant Soil,1989

2. Assessing the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in semiarid shrublands dominated by Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis;Carter;Mycorrhiza,2014

3. Managing medusahead in the intermountain west is at a critical threshold;Davies;Rangelands,2008

4. Characterizing the interaction between a fungal seed pathogen and a deleterious rhizobacterium for biological control of cheatgrass;Dooley;Biol. Control,2010

5. Ecosystem impacts of exotic annual invaders in the genus Bromus;Germino,2016

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Importance of pathobiomes to the success of microbial weed biocontrol agents;Biological Control;2024-05

2. Nontarget effects of pre‐emergent herbicides and a bioherbicide on soil resources, processes, and communities;Restoration Ecology;2024-04-02

3. Plant-Associated Bacteria as Sources for the Development of Bioherbicides;Plants;2022-12-06

4. Plant community context controls short‐ versus medium‐term effects of pre‐emergent herbicides on target and non‐target species after fire;Applied Vegetation Science;2022-04

5. Opportunities for Microbiome Suppression of Weeds Using Regenerative Agricultural Technologies;Frontiers in Soil Science;2022-03-18