The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses

Published:2013-07 Issue:7 Volume:66 Page:736-742.e5
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Mustafa Reem A.,Santesso Nancy,Brozek Jan,Akl Elie A.,Walter Stephen D.,Norman Geoff,Kulasegaram Mahan,Christensen Robin,Guyatt Gordon H.,Falck-Ytter Yngve,Chang Stephanie,Murad Mohammad Hassan,Vist Gunn E.,Lasserson Toby,Gartlehner Gerald,Shukla Vijay,Sun Xin,Whittington Craig,Post Piet N.,Lang Eddy,Thaler Kylie,Kunnamo Ilkka,Alenius Heidi,Meerpohl Joerg J.,Alba Ana C.,Nevis Immaculate F.,Gentles Stephen,Ethier Marie-Chantal,Carrasco-Labra Alonso,Khatib Rasha,Nesrallah Gihad,Kroft Jamie,Selk Amanda,Brignardello-Petersen Romina,Schünemann Holger J.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference23 articles.

1. Available at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/. Accessed June 1, 2012.

2. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations;Guyatt;BMJ,2008

3. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes;Guyatt;J Clin Epidemiol,2011

4. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias);Guyatt;J Clin Epidemiol,2011

5. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness;Guyatt;J Clin Epidemiol,2011

Cited by 296 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evidence, what’s in a name? Some methodological remarks on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for guideline development;Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis;2024-09

2. The impact of an online course on agreement rates of the certainty of evidence assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach: a before-and-after study;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2024-08

3. ENGINE—An EHS Project for Future Guidelines;Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery;2024-07-12

4. Clinical practice guidelines for osteoarthritis: Caveats related to discrepancies in recommendations;Osteoarthritis and Cartilage;2024-07

5. Ultra-processed foods consumption and health-related outcomes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials;Frontiers in Nutrition;2024-06-26