Using argumentation to evaluate software assurance standards-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Using argumentation to evaluate software assurance standards

Published:2013-09 Issue:9 Volume:55 Page:1551-1562
ISSN:0950-5849
Container-title:Information and Software Technology
language:en
Short-container-title:Information and Software Technology

Author:

Graydon Patrick J.,Kelly Tim P.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Information Systems,Software

Reference33 articles.

1. CCMB-2009-07-001, Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 1: Introduction and general model, Version 3.1, Revision 3, Final, Common Criteria, 2009. .

2. CCMB-2009-07-002, Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 2: Security functional components, Version 3.1, Revision 3, Final, Common Criteria, 2009. .

3. CCMB-2009-07-003, Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 3: Security assurance components, Version 3.1, Revision 3, Final, Common Criteria, 2009. .

4. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (fifth ed.), November 2008.

5. DO-178B, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, RTCA, Inc., Washington, DC, USA, 1992.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cybersecurity Approval Criteria: Application of UN R155;SAE Technical Paper Series;2024-07-02

2. Security assurance cases—state of the art of an emerging approach;Empirical Software Engineering;2021-05-18

3. Nuclear safety-critical Digital Instrumentation and Control system software: Reliability demonstration;Annals of Nuclear Energy;2018-10

4. Challenges of information security incident learning: An industrial case study in a Chinese healthcare organization;Informatics for Health and Social Care;2017-01-09

5. Are Standards an Ambiguity-Free Reference for Product Validation?;Reliability, Safety, and Security of Railway Systems. Modelling, Analysis, Verification, and Certification;2017