Security assurance cases—state of the art of an emerging approach

Author:

Mohamad MazenORCID,Steghöfer Jan-Philipp,Scandariato Riccardo

Abstract

AbstractSecurity Assurance Cases (SAC) are a form of structured argumentation used to reason about the security properties of a system. After the successful adoption of assurance cases for safety, SAC are getting significant traction in recent years, especially in safety-critical industries (e.g., automotive), where there is an increasing pressure to be compliant with several security standards and regulations. Accordingly, research in the field of SAC has flourished in the past decade, with different approaches being investigated. In an effort to systematize this active field of research, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of the existing academic studies on SAC. Our review resulted in an in-depth analysis and comparison of 51 papers. Our results indicate that, while there are numerous papers discussing the importance of SAC and their usage scenarios, the literature is still immature with respect to concrete support for practitioners on how to build and maintain a SAC. More importantly, even though some methodologies are available, their validation and tool support is still lacking.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Software

Reference86 articles.

1. Adelard (1998) The adelard safety case development manual

2. Adelard (2003) The adelard safety case editor—asce. Product description available at: http://adelard.co.uk/software/asce/

3. Agudo I, Vivas J L, López J (2009) Security assurance during the software development cycle. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer systems and technologies and workshop for PhD students in computing. ACM, p 20

4. Alexander R, Hawkins R, Kelly T (2011) Security assurance cases: motivation and the state of the art. High Integrity Systems Engineering Department of Computer Science University of York, Deramore Lane York YO10 5GH

5. Ankrum T S, Kromholz A H (2005) Structured assurance cases: three common standards. In: Ninth IEEE international symposium on high-assurance systems engineering (HASE’05). https://doi.org/10.1109/HASE.2005.20, pp 99–108

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A PRISMA-driven systematic mapping study on system assurance weakeners;Information and Software Technology;2024-11

2. Managing security evidence in safety-critical organizations;Journal of Systems and Software;2024-08

3. Increasing the Confidence in Security Assurance Cases using Game Theory;Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security;2024-07-30

4. Cybersecurity Pathways Towards CE-Certified Autonomous Forestry Machines;2024 54th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W);2024-06-24

5. MMINT-A: A framework for model-based safety assurance;Science of Computer Programming;2024-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3