Chest Radiographs Are Valuable in Demonstrating Clinically Significant Pacemaker Complications that Require Reoperation

Author:

Belvin Diane1,Hirschl David1,Jain Vineet R.1,Godelman Alla1,Stein Marjorie W.1,Gross Jay N.2,Haramati Linda B.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA

2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the utility of chest radiography in demonstrating clinically significant pacemaker complications that required reoperation. Methods In this retrospective case-controlled series, we identified 14 consecutive adults who required pacemaker reoperation and who had chest radiographs available for review (6 men, 8 women; mean age, 71 years [range, 43–95 years]). Ten patients had pacemakers implanted at our institution, and 4 were referred for reoperation. Forty-two controls, 3 for each patient, had postoperative chest radiographs and normal device function (25 men, 17 women; mean age 76 years [range, 37–96 years]). All postoperative chest radiographs, including 1-year follow-ups, were blindly reviewed by at least 2 of 4 radiologists for lead perforation and position of right atrial and right ventricular leads. Follow-up radiographs were assessed for lead perforation, lead displacement, and lead fracture. Data were analysed by using the Fisher exact test. Results Of the patients, 1.7% (10/581) required reoperation for pacemaker dysfunction (noncapture, oversensing, abnormal atrial and ventricular thresholds, failing impedance), extracardiac stimulation, and lead perforation and/or displacement. There were no lead fractures. Chest radiographs demonstrated pacemaker complications in 57% of patients (8/14) at a median of 2 days (<1–32 days) after implantation and in 5% of the controls (2/42) ( P < .0001). None of the abnormalities were noted on the official reports. Among subgroups, chest radiographs were abnormal for the following indications: pacemaker dysfunction in 4 of 7 patients versus 0 of 21 controls ( P = .0017), extracardiac stimulation in 1 of 3 patients vs 0 of 9 controls ( P = .25), and lead perforation and/or displacement in 3 of 4 patients vs 2 of 12 controls ( P = .06). Conclusions Chest radiographs are useful after pacemaker placement and demonstrate the majority of complications that require reoperation. Familiarity with the expected normal position of the leads, appearances of pacemaker complications, and comparison with prior radiographs is crucial in rendering a correct diagnosis that guides patient management.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Role of routine investigations post cardiac devices implants in detecting peri‐procedural complications: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary UK center;Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology;2024-01-12

2. How to: a practical guide to cardiac conduction devices on chest radiograph;European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice;2023-05

3. Where Is the Lead?;JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology;2017-01

4. What would surgeons like from materials scientists?;Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology;2013-03-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3